论坛风格切换
  • 7698阅读
  • 26回复

观察了这么久,这里很少有人提到斯巴克SCD-50T这台机器,为什么呢? [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
只看该作者 20 发表于: 2005-12-22
下面是引用enki于2005-12-22 09:15发表的:
我当然知道DENON.LINK. 不过还头回看老这样用的. 3910自己就比3805贵了,而3910只负责解码. 价格更便宜的而3805完成那么多任务,解码,放大,还有VIDEO视频处理部分很大功能. 只要自己动点脑子就知道用3910和3805解码谁的效果好了.


不见得吧。

3805售价便宜一些,3910贵一些,不见得这个定价就是合理的。而且即便是这贵出来的¥2000,也不见得是贵到了3910的解码部分吧。不要忘了3910型号全称是DVD3910,DVD视频部分的素质很高的,也是花了大价钱打造的。

3805解码SACD的时候,视频部分并没有启动,何来“那么多任务”之说?
此情可待成追忆只是当时已惘然
只看该作者 21 发表于: 2005-12-22
下面是引用yxb750302于2005-12-22 09:14发表的:
7000多的价格
真 的是难以接受的


找三越啊。老赵会急发烧友所急,想发烧友所想的。
此情可待成追忆只是当时已惘然
只看该作者 22 发表于: 2005-12-22
Re:Re:they make
下面是引用gerald于2005-12-22 08:58发表的Re:they make:
buddy, format is closely related to effect, isn't it? higher the format is, better the effect is, don't you think so?
if VHR is lower in format than DVD, do you think a movie on VHR can bring you more visual effects than a DVD?
.......

Do not think so, how about the LP? CD should much better than LP. but so far still many guys prefer to LP.(so Hugo come out the LPCD).
So i do not think it is necessary the SACD(XRCD, DVD or LPCD) better than CD. If u audio different formats of one ablum, sometime normal CD are better than SACD. Do u test before?(it is quite funny for some old ablum, the normal CD is quite nice, but the SACD is worsen than CD, and XRCD is better than SACD and CD, for new ablum, SACD seems better than XRCD and CD, do not know why).
只看该作者 23 发表于: 2005-12-22
LP, the analogue sound, is still appreiciated by many fans, claiming that it could convey more details in the music; they believe that while listening to CD, the digitalised sound, a lot of details are lost.   On this, you are right.

it is like in the photo industry, digital cameras can bring more fun but digital cameras are not able to bring the same high performance of the old-style film cameras. The problem is that, digital cameras are getting more and more popular while film cameras are dying out.

so is LP v.s. CD, only highly-bewitched fans are listening to LP today, the common music lovers are all CD now, which is sad but irreversible.

In order to overcome the monotonous sound of CD disc, SACD and XRCD are developed trying to enrich the CD music, so by the way of technical improvement, SACD and XRCD shoud be better than CD.

Surely it happens that sometimes a SACD sounds no better than a CD of same content, but this could mean only one thing - the publisher of this SACD is not doing a good job. If you listen to SACD produced by DG or Top Music, the results are always excellent. If you listen to XRCD produced by First Impression Music (FIM), you have to say that XRCD is also better than a normal CD.

I have personally compared a lot CD with SACD of same music, even yesterday I was listening to "The Larks Ascending" by Williams, played by Halary Hahn, the British violinist, on a SACD made by DG. Then I changed to the same piece of music on a normal CD produced by DECCA, I have to say that the difference is really there! The SACD version does sound better.
此情可待成追忆只是当时已惘然
只看该作者 24 发表于: 2005-12-22
国产音源高于7000元就丧失了竞争力.山灵居然出5万元的CD机,有几人会买?要么只去赚外汇.
SACD机需要更好的周边设备,如宽频音箱、宽频功放,更好的线材。
只看该作者 25 发表于: 2005-12-22
the point is that the format can not guarantee the quality, I think how they recording and copying is much more important than format.
Actualy, here (singapore), in past, SACD and XRCD quite expensive, aboutS$50(2 times of normal CD), but now so many MIC cds come here(only S$15-20), SACD and XRCD had to drop a lot(now about S$30+). But now CD is more popular than SACD, XRCD or LPCD, and do not think SACD can replace CD be mainstream format( many guys come back to normal CD).
Frankly, every few years, the companies will raise new format (now is LPCD) so that we have to update ur hardware and software if fellow their steps( they can make many money).But we should think whether it worth or not. Unless use good(=high-end=expensive) SACD player and disk, it is meaningless to play SACD (but good news is that now come out SACD hybrid CD that can play on normal CD player)
My point is that content is more important than format. No need follow the companies' steps, we are not at the same side with these companies.
Anyway it is my personal opinion, just for fun!
Enjoy ur music
[ 此贴被liuns在2005-12-22 18:00 ]
只看该作者 26 发表于: 2005-12-23
totally agree with you, what is on the CD is more important than how this CD is made.  

of course, with such price, Singapore is a good place to buy CD and SACDs, in Shanghai, SACD costs average S$50 or so and high quality CD costs S$30.

and never forget - Singapore is higher in salary! it is not fair.
此情可待成追忆只是当时已惘然
快速回复
限100 字节
 
上一个 下一个